Per Curiam.
The sole inquiry presented by this cause is whether the trial court committed prejudicial error in excluding appellee's proposed evidence of his prior sexual conduct with the victim. The question of the constitutionality of the statute is not before us.
R. C. 2907.02(D) provides, in applicable part, that evidence of specific instances of the victim's past sexual activity with the accused is admissible at trial only where the court determines...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
