1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 100 Cal.App.3d
  5. 100 Cal.App.3d 303 (1979)
 

W.E.J. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 56347.

100 Cal.App.3d 303 (1979)

160 Cal. Rptr. 862

W.E.J. et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; F.L., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Four.

December 21, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Palmer & Bartenetti, Philip W. Bartenetti, Clark & Trevithick, Donald P. Clark and Dolores Cordell for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Garber & Rudof and J.M. Groshan for Real Party in Interest.

OPINION

FILES, P.J.

(1) This original proceeding requires us to determine whether or not the biological father of a nonmarital child, who is not a "presumed father" as defined in Civil Code section 7004,1 holds the power to veto a proposed adoption. Our conclusion is that, although the biological father is entitled to be heard in opposition to the adoption proceedings, and to present his own...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases