WILLIAM G. CALLOW, J.
Plaintiff in error was convicted, following a jury trial and a verdict of guilty, of theft of property exceeding $100 in value, contrary to secs. 943.20(1) (a) and 943.20(3)(b), Stats. The issues raised on appeal are whether the evidence was sufficient to support the conviction and whether the trial court erred in denying plaintiff in error's motion for a new trial because the prosecutor cross-examined plaintiff in error concerning his refusal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.