1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 278 N.W.2d
  5. 278 N.W.2d 97 (1979)
 

DODGE v. MINN. MINING & MFG. CO.

No. 47665.

278 N.W.2d 97 (1979)

Lucille A. DODGE, et al., Plaintiffs, Catherine Wermlund, Margaret Hankes and Mary P. Peterson, Appellants, v. MINNESOTA MINING AND MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

April 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ruttenberg, Orren Griswold & Bernet and Kenneth P. Griswold and Lee A. Bernet, III, St. Paul, for appellants.

Oppenheimer, Wolff, Foster, Shepard & Donnelly, Thomas P. Kane, Samuel E. Wetterlin and Keith E. Goodwin, St. Paul, for respondent.

Heard before KELLY, YETKA, and SCOTT, JJ., and considered and decided by the court en banc.

YETKA, Justice.

This is an appeal by plaintiffs Margaret Hankes, Mary Peterson, and Catherine Wermlund from judgment entered pursuant to an order of Ramsey County District Court, finding that defendant Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Corporation had engaged in employment practices that discriminated on the basis of sex but denying these three plaintiffs back pay and other relief on the ground that they had suffered no damages as a result of such practices. We affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases