STOTT v. CERVANTES

No. 2664-3.

23 Wn. App. 346 (1979)

595 P.2d 563

BILL F. STOTT, ET AL, Appellants, v. FAUSTINO CERVANTES, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

May 15, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Raekes, Ettig & Osborne and Stephen T. Osborne, for appellants.

Faustino Cervantes, pro se.


ROE, J.

Plaintiffs Stott contracted to purchase certain real property from defendants Cervantes. Paragraph 18 of the contract provided:

ATTORNEY'S FEES AND VENUE — In the event of any lawsuit between the parties to this contract to settle issues arising hereunder, the prevailing party shall recover judgment against the other party for a reasonable attorney's fee.

(Italics ours.) Believing there had been misrepresentations as to the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases