LINDQUIST v. DENGEL

No. 45737.

92 Wn.2d 257 (1979)

595 P.2d 934

BRUCE LINDQUIST, ET AL, Respondents, v. DANIEL M. DENGEL, ET AL, Petitioners.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

May 31, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gavin, Robinson, Kendrick, Redman & Mays, William H. Mays, and Dennis L. Fluegge, for petitioners.

Rodney M. Reinbold and Edward A. Dawson, for respondents.


HOROWITZ, J.

This case raises the question whether we must carve out an exception for physicians to the general rule that a tort-feasor is liable for the exacerbation, or augmentation in severity, of a plaintiff's injuries resulting from later medical treatment where the tort-feasor's negligence arguably created the need for that treatment. We hold the rule does apply to physicians and affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals.

Respondent Bruce Lindquist...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases