SATO v. VAN DENBURGH

No. 14169.

123 Ariz. 225 (1979)

599 P.2d 181

Carl K. SATO and Susie S. Sato, his wife, Appellants, v. Robert P. VAN DENBURGH, Conn and Candlin, Certified Public Accountants, Green & Van Denburgh, Certified Public Accountants, and Main Lafrentz & Co., Certified Public Accountants, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Arizona, In Banc.

Rehearing Denied September 6, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wade Nelson & Andersen, Ltd. by E. Gene Wade, Mesa, for appellants.

Renaud, Cook & Videan, P.A. by James M. Videan, Phoenix, for appellees.


CAMERON, Chief Justice.

Carl and Susie Sato appeal from a summary judgment entered against them and in favor of Robert P. Van Denburgh and three accounting firms with which he had been associated. We have jurisdiction of this appeal pursuant to Rule 19(e), Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, 17A A.R.S.

We must address only one question on appeal: Was Sato's cause of action barred by the statute of limitations?

The facts necessary for a resolution of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases