1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 89 Cal.App.3d
  5. 89 Cal.App.3d 240 (1979)
 

AMOROSO v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 45553.

89 Cal.App.3d 240 (1979)

152 Cal. Rptr. 398

PETER J. AMOROSO et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF CONTRA COSTA COUNTY, Respondent; ALBERT PERCHERT et al., Real Parties in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

February 7, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Mark Adams Poppett, Lynn Theilacker Carew, Ramos, Herlihy & Broadbeck and Edmond R. Pietraczyk for Petitioners.

No appearance for Respondent.

Jack C. Runnion for Real Parties in Interest.

OPINION

WHITE, P.J.

(1) This writ petition raises the question of whether provisions of Code of Civil Procedure section 1013, subdivision (a) apply to extend by five days the twenty-day time limit for requesting trial after an attempt to decide the case by arbitration. We have concluded that no such extension is authorized.

The Judicial Arbitration Rules for Civil Cases were adopted by the Judicial Council and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases