1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 24 Wn.
  5. 24 Wn. App. 265 (1979)
 

DUNSTAN v. SEATTLE

No. 6763-1.

24 Wn. App. 265 (1979)

600 P.2d 674

PAUL D. DUNSTAN, ET AL, Appellants, v. THE CITY OF SEATTLE, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

September 17, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lycette, Diamond & Sylvester and Lyle L. Iversen, for appellants.

Douglas N. Jewett, City Attorney, Ellen D. Peterson and Lawrence K. McDonell, Assistants, Lane, Powell, Moss & Miller, and Dale W. House, for respondents.

SWANSON, A.C.J.

Paul and Roberta Dunstan appeal an adverse summary judgment in an action in tort against the City of Seattle.1 The Dunstans assign error to the trial court's conclusions of law that the action was barred by (1) a 60-day statute of limitation, (2) the Dunstans' failure to exhaust legal remedies, and (3) their failure to allege and present evidence establishing a cause of action in either common law, negligence, or interference...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases