LAUFENBERG v. COSMETOLOGY EXAMINING BOARD

Nos. 76-191, 76-192.

87 Wis.2d 175 (1979)

274 N.W.2d 618

LAUFENBERG, Petitioner-Appellant, v. COSMETOLOGY EXAMINING BOARD OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REGULATION & LICENSING, Respondent. MORRILL, Petitioner-Appellant, v. BARBER'S EXAMINING BOARD OF WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REGULATION & LICENSING, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Wisconsin.

Decided January 30, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Laufenberg and Morrill, as petitioners, have appealed. An undertaking to stay the execution of the judgment pending appeal has been filed.

For the appellants there was a brief by Donald S. Eisenberg and Eisenberg, Giesen & Ewers, and oral argument by John Louderman, all of Madison.

For the respondents the cause was argued by John J. Glinski, assistant attorney general, with whom on the brief was Bronson C. La Follette, attorney general, and John W. Calhoun, assistant attorney general.


CONNOR T. HANSEN, J.

In both cases the parties filed stipulations of facts with their respective licensing boards. The result was that no hearing was held and no testimony or evidence was otherwise presented. Review on appeal is thus limited to the facts set forth in the stipulations.

In the proceeding before the Cosmetology Examining Board, Laufenberg and the board entered into the following stipulation of facts:

1. That Patricia A. Laufenberg at...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases