OSTERHOUT v. SARDO


66 A.D.2d 167 (1979)

Eugene Osterhout, Inc., Appellant, v. Frances Sardo et al., Respondents, and County of Sullivan, Intervenor-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

February 8, 1979


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kalter & Gottlieb (Jeffrey Kaplan of counsel), for appellant.

Meyer, Diesenhouse & Feinson (Robert M. Feinson of counsel), for respondents.

William C. Rosen, County Attorney, for intervenor-respondent.

GREENBLOTT, SWEENEY, KANE and MAIN, JJ., concur.


MAHONEY, P. J.

In this action to compel the determination of conflicting claims to real property (Real Property Actions and Proceedings Law, art 15), the parties claim title through deeds originating from different sources. Accordingly, it is necessary to review the chains of title upon which the parties rely.

The property in question, consisting of two separate parcels of land adjacent to each other...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases