SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DIST. v. SUPERIOR COURT

Docket No. 18373.

90 Cal.App.3d 135 (1979)

154 Cal. Rptr. 1

SOUTH TAHOE PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT, Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF EL DORADO COUNTY, Respondent; CH2M HILL CALIFORNIA, INC., Real Party in Interest.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

February 13, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Rust & Armenis and Daniel E. Wilcoxen for Petitioner.

No appearance for Respondent.

Farella, Braun & Martel, Douglas R. Young and Alan E. Harris for Real Party in Interest.


OPINION

PUGLIA, P.J.

Petitioner applies for a writ of prohibition and/or mandate following the trial court's issuance of an order compelling petitioner to answer an interrogatory calling for disclosure of the names and addresses of experts it had consulted with and who might be called to testify at a presently unscheduled trial.

"Preliminarily, it may be observed that the prerogative...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases