Per Curiam.
Initially, appellant challenges the nine percent rate of return allowed on its capital structure. Appellant argues that the weight of the testimony submitted with respect to its cost of equity demonstrates that a 14 to 16 percent rate of return was warranted. Appellant avers that the commission erred in accepting a 10 to 12 percent cost of equity calculation, since this recommendation was submitted by commission staff witnesses whose expertise in...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
