1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 608 F.2d
  5. 608 F.2d 1376 (1979)
 

RHODIA, INC., HESS & CLARK v. FOOD & DRUG ADMIN.

No. 77-1616.

608 F.2d 1376 (1979)

RHODIA, INC., HESS & CLARK DIVISION, Petitioner, v. FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION, Respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided September 18, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Eugene I. Lambert, Washington, D. C., with whom Richard F. Kingham, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for petitioner.

Arthur E. Korkosz, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., with whom Richard M. Cooper, Chief Counsel, Forrest T. Patterson and Jess H. Stribling, Jr., Associate Chief Counsel, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md., were on the brief, for respondent.

Before McGOWAN, LEVENTHAL and MacKINNON, Circuit Judges.

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL.

Additional statement of Circuit Judge LEVENTHAL.

LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judge:

Rhodia, Inc., Hess & Clark Division (Rhodia) sought to amend approved new animal drug applications (NADA's) in effect for three products containing the active drug furazolidone so as to include new sources of supply of the bulk drug in addition to the one named in the original NADA's. The Director of the Bureau of Veterinary...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases