PROCTER & GAMBLE MFG. CO. v. N. L. R. B.

No. 78-1716.

603 F.2d 1310 (1979)

The PROCTER & GAMBLE MANUFACTURING COMPANY, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Association of Employees of the Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company's St. Louis Plant, Intervenor-respondent.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided August 23, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Harold S. Freeman of Dinsmore, Shohl, Coates & Deupree, Cincinnati, Ohio, argued and Michael S. Glassman, Cincinnati, Ohio, on appendix and briefs, for petitioner.

Edward S. Dorsey, Atty., N. L. R. B., Washington, D.C. argued, and Andrew E. Tranovich, Atty., John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel; John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy Gen. Counsel; Robert E. Allen, Acting Assoc. Gen. Counsel; and Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., on brief, for respondent.

Before LAY, ROSS and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.


McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge.

The Procter & Gamble Manufacturing Company (the Company) petitions this court, pursuant to § 10(f) of the National Labor Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 151, et seq., (the Act) to review a decision and order of the National Labor Relations Board (the Board). The Board affirmed the rulings and findings of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) and adopted her recommended order.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases