HANDABAKA v. DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS


167 N.J. Super. 12 (1979)

400 A.2d 490

RICHARD V. HANDABAKA, APPELLANT, v. DIVISION OF CONSUMER AFFAIRS, DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UTILITIES, DEPARTMENT OF CIVIL SERVICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 15, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Richard V. Handabaka, appellant, argued the cause pro se.

Mr. Peter J. Calderone, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Mr. John J. Degnan, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney; Ms. Erminie L. Conley, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; Mr. Henry D. Blinder, Deputy Attorney General, on the brief).

Before Judges FRITZ, BISCHOFF and MORGAN.


PER CURIAM.

The erratic procedural course taken by this matter, clearly attributable to the pro se appellant's unfamiliarity with legal matters, commenced with an action in the Superior Court wherein appellant, a job applicant for a Civil Service appointment for which he qualified by examination, sought from respondents, Department of Public Utilities and Division of Consumer Affairs, appointment to the position of Auditor 3 or Accountant 3, the displacement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases