1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 602 P.2d
  5. 602 P.2d 1143 (1979)
 

ADAMS v. CROOK

No. 7756; CA 11597.

602 P.2d 1143 (1979)

43 Or.App. 427

Ronald W. ADAMS, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, v. William Vernon CROOK and Mary Jacqueline Crook, Husband and Wife, Respondents-Cross-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided November 26, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs was Dye & Olson, Salem.

Richard L. Barron, Coos Bay, argued the cause for respondents-cross-appellants. With him on the briefs was Bedingfield, Joelson, Gould & Barron, Coos Bay.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and TANZER and ROBERTS, JJ.

ROBERTS, Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit in equity to establish a right of way by either prescriptive or implied easement across defendants' property. The trial court found an implied easement and plaintiff appeals, citing as error the trial court's limitation of the easement to agricultural use. Defendants cross appeal, citing as error the trial court's granting of the easement. We affirm.1

The record includes a drawing of the disputed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases