MATTER OF MARRIAGE OF PULLEN

No. D7705-06474; CA 10674.

589 P.2d 1145 (1979)

38 Or.App. 137

In the matter of the Marriage of Sarah M. PULLEN, Appellant-Cross-Respondent, AND George F. Pullen, Respondent-Cross-Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman J. Wiener, Portland, argued the cause for appellant-cross-respondent. With him on the briefs were Peter C. Richter, James N. Westwood, and Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

Ralph L. Bolliger, Beaverton, argued the cause for respondent-cross-appellant. With him on the brief were Arthur L. Tarlow and Bolliger, Hampton & Tarlow, P.C., Beaverton.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON, TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.


TANZER, Judge.

In this appeal from the property division provisions of a dissolution decree, wife contends that the trial court's order requiring her to pay husband $48,000 is inequitable and unconstitutional. Husband cross-appeals, contending that he should have been awarded approximately half of the total property owned by the parties.

The parties were married for eight years and have two children, ages 3 and 6. Husband, age 31, has been employed for several...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases