1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 589 P.2d
  5. 589 P.2d 1136 (1979)
 

STATE v. HAWK

No. 77-14759-T; CA 11043.

589 P.2d 1136 (1979)

38 Or.App. 117

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. William Earl HAWK, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided January 29, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William Earl Hawk, pro se.

James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen., and Allison E. Smith, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON, TANZER and BUTTLER, JJ.

THORNTON, Judge.

Defendant was convicted of the statutory infraction Driving Under the Influence of Intoxicants, ORS 487.540.

He sets forth 17 assignments of error. Two of the alleged errors involve jury instructions.

Defendant requested the following instruction:

"If you find that, as a matter of fact, the arresting officer did not have probable cause, for making the arrest of the defendant then the arrest was unlawful and you may not consider...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases