1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 612 F.2d
  5. 612 F.2d 1105 (1979)
 

GRANDDAD BREAD v. CONTINENTAL BAKING CO.

No. 78-3698.

612 F.2d 1105 (1979)

GRANDDAD BREAD, INC., a corporation, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CONTINENTAL BAKING CO., a corporation, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied February 21, 1980.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles R. Lonergan, Jr., Seattle, Wash., argued for plaintiff-appellant; Raymond H. Siderius, Siderius, Lonergan & Crowley, Seattle, Wash., on the brief.

E. Edward Bruce, Washington, D. C., argued for defendant-appellee; Nancy P. Gibbs, Seattle, Wash., on the brief.

Before HUFSTEDLER and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges, and GRANT, District Judge.

J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge:

This antitrust case involves an appeal by Granddad Bread, Inc., (Granddad) from judgment n. o. v. in favor of Continental Baking Company (Continental). The court below found that Continental's activities were, in part, protected by the labor exemption to the antitrust laws, and that there was insufficient evidence to support liability under the other conspiracy theories. We agree and affirm...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases