HOLMES, Judge.
This is an unemployment compensation case.
The sole issue on appeal is whether the claimant met her burden of proof regarding "availability for work." § 25-4-77, Code of Ala. 1975.
The Department of Industrial Relations contends the claimant did not meet the burden of proof; we disagree and affirm.
The only testimony regarding the claimant's "availability for work" is her own and is as follows:
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.