Defendant was convicted of rape in the first degree (Penal Law, § 130.35, subd 1), and murder in the second degree (Penal Law, § 125.25, subd 3, "felony murder"). He maintains, inter alia, that his confession should have been excluded on the basis that it was the product of an improper continuation of interrogation after he had requested an attorney.
In the course of their...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
