YOUNG v. HARRIS

No. 78-1896.

599 F.2d 870 (1979)

Ruby YOUNG, Monroe Young, Kim Greene, Joseph Weaver, Georgia Weaver, Ollie Green, Thomas Green, and Barbara Bradshaw, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Appellants, v. Patricia HARRIS, Sued in her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development, Pantheon Corporation, a corporation, Pershing Redevelopment Corporation, a corporation, City of St. Louis, a Body Corporate, John Young, Thelma Young, Richard Shelton, Lipton Realty, Inc., a corporation, and the St. Louis Housing Authority, a Municipal Corporation, Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

Decided June 13, 1979.

Rehearing and Rehearing Denied July 6, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jim Eggleston, St. Louis, Mo., argued, Arlene Zarembka, Legal Service of Eastern Missouri, St. Louis, Mo. and Margaret Zonia Morrison, Legal Service of Eastern Missouri, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellants.

Anne C. Travis, Asst. U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., argued, Robert D. Kingsland, U. S. Atty., St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellee, HUD, Patricia Harris.

Charles A. Seigel, St. Louis, Mo., argued, Harvey A. Harris, Jeffrey H. Pass and Christopher M. Blanton, Stolar, Heitzmann & Eder, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellees, Pantheon and Pershing.

Michael E. Hughes, Asst. City Counselor, St. Louis, Mo., argued, Jack L. Koehr, City Counselor, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellee, City of St. Louis.

G. Carroll Stribling of Fordyce & Mayne, Clayton, Mo., for appellee, Richard Shelton.

Charles W. Kunderer of Klutho, Cody & Kilo, St. Louis, Mo., argued, Edward C. Cody and Victor J. Klutho, St. Louis, Mo., on brief, for appellee, St. Louis Housing.

Richard P. Sher of Peper, Martin, Jensen, Maichel & Hetlage, St. Louis, Mo., filed brief, for appellee, Lipton Realty, Inc.

Before GIBSON, Chief Judge, and ROSS and McMILLIAN, Circuit Judges.


Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied July 6, 1979.

GIBSON, Chief Judge.

This is an appeal from the District Court's1 denial of appellants' motion for a preliminary injunction restraining appellees from continuing the redevelopment of the Pershing-Waterman area of St. Louis, Missouri. Jurisdiction in this court rests upon 28 U.S.C. § 1292(a)(1).

I

Appellants represent a class of persons who are present and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases