1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.E.2d
  4. 390 N.E.2d
  5. 390 N.E.2d 1052 (1979)
 

MOORE v. SMITH

No. 2-978-A-316.

390 N.E.2d 1052 (1979)

Charles MOORE and Lt. Smitherman, Appellants (Respondents below), v. Harold SMITH and James Hoskins, Appellees (Petitioners below).

Court of Appeals of Indiana, Fourth District.

June 19, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Theo. L. Sendak, Atty. Gen., David L. Steiner, Deputy Atty. Gen., Indianapolis, for appellants.

Harold Smith and James Hoskins, pro se.

YOUNG, Judge.

Harold Smith and James Hoskins filed a Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus and Writ of Mandate. The substance of the complaint alleged that officials of the Indiana Reformatory at Pendleton were not complying with the policy of the Department of Corrections regarding lay advocates. No question was raised at the trial court or argued here that the commitment of either Smith or Hoskins was illegal.

Hoskins, an inmate of the Indiana Reformatory serving...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases