WRIGHT v. LANE CTY.

No. 77-6907; CA 13013.

595 P.2d 835 (1979)

40 Or.App. 443

Robert J. WRIGHT, Appellant, v. LANE COUNTY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 29, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert J. Wright, appellant, filed a brief pro se.

Randall Bryson, Bryson & Bryson and Calkins & Calkins, Eugene, filed the brief for respondent.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and TANZER, RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ.


TANZER, Judge.

Plaintiff sought a judgment declaring that Lane County was required to widen Hale Road, on which the plaintiff lives, to conform to the specifications set out in the Lane County Manual. Both parties moved for summary judgment and the court granted the defendant's motion. Plaintiff appeals.

Plaintiff's first assignment of error is that the trial court should have determined that the Lane Manual, section 15.205 et seq., required Lane County...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases