HORTON v. MRS. SMITH'S PIE CO.

WCB 76-6988; CA 11473.

590 P.2d 791 (1979)

38 Or.App. 575

In the matter of the Compensation of Edna HORTON, Claimant, Petitioner-Cross-Respondent, v. MRS. SMITH'S PIE COMPANY, Respondent-Cross-Petitioner.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 20, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David W. Hittle, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs was Dye & Olson, Salem.

L. Edward Robbins, Portland, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Souther, Spaulding, Kinsey, Williamson & Schwabe, and Delbert J. Brenneman and Ridgway K. Foley, Jr., Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and GILLETTE and ROBERTS, JJ.


GILLETTE, Judge.

In this Workers' Compensation case, the claimant appeals the Workers' Compensation Board's reduction to 15% unscheduled permanent disability of a referee's order granting 50% disability. We reverse and reinstate the referee's award.

Recitation of the facts is not warranted. See Hoag v. Duraflake, 37 Or.App. 103, 585 P.2d 1149 (1978). The case is a factual one, hinging...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases