1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.W.2d
  4. 586 S.W.2d
  5. 586 S.W.2d 773 (1979)
 

BOLLINGER v. SIGMAN

No. WD 29988.

586 S.W.2d 773 (1979)

George E. BOLLINGER, Mildred B. Bollinger, Richard O. Stroud and Mary Ann Stroud, Appellants, v. Van SIGMAN and Virginia Sigman, Respondents.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District.

September 4, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert Copaken and Sylvia Copaken, Kansas City, for appellants.

Jimmie D. James, Independence, for respondents; James & Sperry, Independence, of counsel.

Before SOMERVILLE, P. J., and PRITCHARD and MANFORD, JJ.

PRITCHARD, Judge.

The issue is whether there was sufficient evidence to support a finding of mutual mistake on the description in a deed which was sought to be reformed on that ground. The trial court found and concluded that the evidence was insufficient to support reformation and entered judgment against plaintiffs Stroud.

In a previous appeal, Bollinger v. Sigman, 520 S.W.2d 710

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases