1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 92 Wn.2d
  5. 92 Wn.2d 40 (1979)
 

MIESKE v. BARTELL DRUG CO.

No. 45324.

92 Wn.2d 40 (1979)

593 P.2d 1308

EDWIN MIESKE, ET AL, Respondents, v. THE BARTELL DRUG COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

April 19, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven S. Bell and Perkins, Coie, Stone, Olsen & Williams, for appellants.

Charles W. Mertel, A. Richard Dykstra, and Scholfield & Stafford, for respondents.

BRACHTENBACH, J.

This case determines the measure of damages for personal property, developed movie film, which is destroyed, and which cannot be replaced or reproduced. It also decides the legal effect of a clause which purports to limit the responsibility of a film processor to replacement of film.

We will detail the facts later, but the heart of the matter is that plaintiffs delivered already developed movie film...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases