1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 591 P.2d
  5. 591 P.2d 728 (1979)
 

IN RE RICHMOND

OSB 1297; SC 25749.

591 P.2d 728 (1979)

285 Or. 469

In re Complaint As to the Conduct of Henry R. RICHMOND, III, Accused.

Supreme Court of Oregon, In Banc.

Decided March 8, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles F. Hinkle, Portland, argued the cause for the accused. With him on the briefs were Henry H. Hewitt and Michael H. Bierman, Portland.

David P. Weiner, Portland, argued the cause for the Oregon State Bar. With him on the brief was Marvin S. Nepom, Portland.

PER CURIAM.

The question to be decided is whether Henry R. Richmond III, a member of the Oregon State Bar, committed a professional impropriety when he wrote a letter informing the Governor of Oregon of an administrative proceeding initiated by Richmond on behalf of private parties and sent copies of the letter to a number of legislators and newspaper editors. The Oregon State Bar charged Richmond with a violation of DR7-107(G), a disciplinary rule directing attorneys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases