1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 472 F.Supp.
  5. 472 F.Supp. 793 (1979)
 

O. HOMMEL CO. v. FERRO CORP.

Civ. A. No. 76-1299 B.

472 F.Supp. 793 (1979)

O. HOMMEL COMPANY v. FERRO CORPORATION.

United States District Court, W. D. Pennsylvania.

June 21, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

David B. Buerger, Martha A. Zatezalo, Pittsburgh, Pa., George I. Meisel, Cleveland, Ohio, for plaintiff.

Arthur J. Schwab, Pittsburgh, Pa., for defendant.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

KNOX, District Judge.

Plaintiff (Hommel) and defendant (Ferro) compete in the United States in the sale of frit, a basic ingredient in porcelain enamel and ceramic finishings. Plaintiff filed this antitrust suit against defendant alleging that Ferro violated § 2 of the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2, and the Robinson-Patman Amendment to the Clayton Act, 15 U.S.C. § 13, by selling frit to certain customers below cost...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases