1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 372 So.2d
  5. 372 So.2d 825 (1979)
 

CITY OF BIRMINGHAM v. MEAD CORP.

77-735.

372 So.2d 825 (1979)

The CITY OF BIRMINGHAM, a Municipal Corp. v. The MEAD CORPORATION, a corporation, et al.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied July 6, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James L. North, Frank M. Young, III, Philip W. Norwood, Birmingham, for appellant.

Norman K. Brown, Bessemer, for The Mead Corp., appellee.

J. Fred Powell and William F. Murray, Jr., Birmingham, for United States Steel Corp., appellee.

Irvine C. Porter and James W. Porter, II, Birmingham, for appellee-defendant and counter-claimant, City of Homewood.

Kenneth Perrine, Birmingham, for Mason Corp., a corp., W. T. Mayfield, Jr., Mary Clyde Mayfield, W. C., Renneker, Ann M. Renneker, individuals, Mayfield Mfg. Co., Inc., a corp.

PER CURIAM.

This litigation has been before this court several times. City of Homewood v. State of Alabama ex rel. City of Birmingham, 358 So.2d 424 (Ala.1978); Mead Corporation v. City of Birmingham, 350 So.2d 419 (Ala.1977); Mead Corporation v. City of Birmingham, 295 Ala. 14, 321 So.2d 655 (1975). It concerns the validity of an annexation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases