HIATT v. TONISSEN

No. 102367; CA No. 11096.

596 P.2d 597 (1979)

40 Or.App. 749

LaVerne HIATT, Respondent, v. George TONISSEN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 25, 1979.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James N. Westwood, Portland, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief were Harvey C. Barragar and Miller, Anderson, Nash, Yerke & Wiener, Portland.

Tony Pizzuti, Canby, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief was Clifford L. Freeman, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and LEE, BUTTLER, and JOSEPH, JJ.


LEE, Judge.

Plaintiff brought suit in equity for termination of a partnership and for an accounting. The court found for plaintiff.

In its decree, the court declared a certain parcel of real property to be a partnership asset in which plaintiff and defendant owned undivided one-half interests as tenants in common. All other assets of the partnership were also equally divided between plaintiff and defendant. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases