ROBERT M. MARTIN, Judge.
The question dispositive of this case is whether the court erred in denying defendant's motion for judgment of nonsuit. Defendant does not contest the proof of a crime against Mrs. Vaden. He argues that Mrs. Vaden's testimony identifying him as her robber and assailant was insufficient to survive his motion for nonsuit. On such motion the evidence is taken in the light most favorable to the State. State v. Cutler,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
