Judgment affirmed.
Only one of defendant's arguments merits discussion. He claims that the court's charge to the jury that it may rely on "the presumption that a person intends the natural and probable consequences of his act" violated the rule set forth in Sandstrom v Montana (
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.