Order affirmed, without costs or disbursements.
Although the application which led to the order under review should not have been entertained because it was in the nature of a motion to reargue and not a motion to vacate a default (see CPLR 2216, 2221), under the facts herein this court is not bound by the doctrine of the
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.