1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 589 F.2d
  5. 589 F.2d 474 (1979)
 

UNITED STATES v. PARR

No. 78-1997.

589 F.2d 474 (1979)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark PARR, Catherine Parr, Ashley Allen, Compass, Inc., and C.C.M., Inc., Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

January 12, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William C. Turner, Asst. U.S. Atty. (argued), Las Vegas, Nev., for plaintiff-appellant.

V. DeVoe Heaton (argued), Las Vegas, Nev., for defendants-appellees.

Before CHOY and SNEED, Circuit Judges, and WATERS, District Court.

PER CURIAM:

The indictment which the trial court dismissed at best was very poorly drafted. To assure the defendants a fair trial and to immunize any resulting conviction from reversal on appeal would require, to the extent possible, that the trial judge charge the jury with great care and precision. It is far more just and expedient to require the prosecution to obtain a satisfactorily drafted superseding indictment. We think the trial court's dismissal of the indictment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases