UNITED STATES of America
v.
Walter R. WEBSTER et al.
UNITED STATES of America
v.
Arnetta Delly ENNELS et al.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 26, 1979.
June 26, 1979.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Glenn L. Cook, and D. Christopher Ohley, Asst. U. S. Attys., Baltimore, Md., for United States.
Harold I. Glaser, Baltimore, Md., for defendants Walter R. Webster and Norma Thompson.
Michael Marr, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Richard Adams.
Howard L. Cardin, Baltimore, Md., for defendants Boysie Ash and Norman Henson.
Harry B. Allen, Oxon Hill, Md., for defendant Richard Wilkes.
Leslie L. Gladstone, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Melvin Stanford.
Stanley H. Miller, Baltimore, Md., for defendant John V. Christian.
Josh Treem, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Jane Doe.
Benjamin Lipsitz, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Herbert Leon Johnson.
William Murphy, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Norman George Johnson.
Dean P. Gunby, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Julius Odell Martin.
Robin John Pecora, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Duran Montgomery.
James M. Kramon, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Dennis Elroy Smith.
Peter Ward, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Sharon Taylor.
Mark Lee Phillips, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Victoria Wills.
Kenneth L. Thompson, Baltimore, Md., and George L. Russell, Jr., Baltimore, Md., for defendants Arnetta Delly Ennels, Barbara Moaney, and Nathaniel Knox.
John A. Hayes, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Danny Ragland.
David B. Mitchell, Baltimore, Md., for defendant Venus Briscoe.
Joseph Kiel, Towson, Md., for defendant Jesse Robinson.
United States District Court, D. Maryland.
JOSEPH H. YOUNG, District Judge.
These two narcotics conspiracy cases were consolidated for the purpose of ruling on defendants' open motions to suppress certain conversations intercepted by court-ordered wiretaps. The defendants in Y-79-060 have either filed or adopted motions seeking to suppress all evidence obtained either directly or indirectly from electronic surveillance of certain telephone numbers on the grounds that the state-ordered wiretap failed to satisfy...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
