1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 604 P.2d
  5. 604 P.2d 447 (1979)
 

HOOD VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD v. BD. OF CTY. COM'RS

No. 76-11-163; CA 11365.

604 P.2d 447 (1979)

43 Or.App. 869

HOOD VIEW NEIGHBORHOOD Association, Bill Prentice, Barbara Prentice, Clarke Miller, Sue Miller, Joe Taylor, Helen Taylor, Dick Caffall, Varion Caffall, Charles T. Smith, Marie Smith, Dale Rose, Phyllis Rose, Jessee Stanton, Helen Stanton, Frances Hess, Ida Hess, Howard Dugan, and Lynn Hinton, Appellants, v. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF CLACKAMAS COUNTY, Oregon and Its Members, Ralph Groener, Robert Schumacher, Stan Skoko, and Carl M. Halvorson, Inc., Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided December 24, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank Josselson, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the briefs were Kimball H. Ferris and Jones, Lang, Klein, Wolf & Smith, Portland.

Keith J. Kinsman, Asst. County Counsel, Oregon City, argued the cause for respondent Bd. of County Com'rs of Clackamas County, Oregon. With him on the brief were Scott H. Parker, Clackamas County Counsel, and Michael E. Judd, Asst. Clackamas County Counsel, Oregon City.

Garry P. McMurry, Portland, argued the cause for respondent Carl M. Halvorson, Inc. With him on the brief were Rankin, McMurry, Osburn, Gallagher & VavRosky, and Patric J. Doherty, Portland.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., TANZER, RICHARDSON and ROBERTS, JJ., and PETERSON, J. Pro Tem.

ROBERTS, Judge.

Plaintiffs in this writ of review proceeding appeal from an order of the trial court affirming the county commissioners' approval of a preliminary plat for companion subdivisions totaling 92 homesites on 479 acres of land between the cities of Sherwood and Wilsonville in Clackamas County. Plaintiffs' dispositive contention is that the plat does not conform to the Agricultural Lands Goal (Goal # 3) of the statewide planning goals adopted by the Land...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases