1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 91 Cal.App.3d
  5. 91 Cal.App.3d 942 (1979)
 

MUNOZ v. PURDY

Docket No. 16980.

91 Cal.App.3d 942 (1979)

154 Cal. Rptr. 472

SONIA MUNOZ, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. EVERETT K. PURDY, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division One.

April 16, 1979.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Miller, Boyko & Bell, Terry D. Harper and Robert K. Schraner for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Ault, Midlam & Reynolds, Douglas R. Reynolds, David J. Danielsen, Holt, Rhoades & Hollywood and Larry A. Shoffner for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

WIENER, J.

(1a) We are asked to decide in this appeal whether the trial court properly interpreted and applied Code of Civil Procedure section 4741 in granting Everett K. Purdy's motion for summary judgment based upon the one-year statute of limitations (§ 340.5). For the reasons which we will discuss, we conclude the trial court...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases