HALSETH v. STATE FARM MUT. AUTO. INS. CO.

No. 48115.

268 N.W.2d 730 (1978)

Virginia HALSETH, et al., Respondents, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Appellant.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

July 14, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meagher, Geer, Markham, Anderson, Adamson, Flaskamp & Brennan, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Miller, Neary & Zins, Minneapolis, for respondents.

Minnesota Trial Lawyers Assn., Gregory P. Joseph, Minneapolis, amicus curiae.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


OTIS H. GODFREY, Jr., Justice.*

Defendant's appeal in this declaratory judgment action challenges the determination of the district court that a provision in automobile liability insurance policies issued by defendant under which plaintiffs sought uninsured-motorist coverage is invalid because it contravenes the intent of Minn.St. 65B.49, subd. 4. We affirm.

The three policies in question all define a "hit-and-run vehicle" as ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases