MADDOX, Justice.
The issue here is whether a patient's malpractice suit was barred by limitations. We hold that it was not and reverse the trial court's granting of the doctor's motion for summary judgment.
At the hearing on motion for summary judgment, it was admitted that the act or omission complained of occurred more than two years prior to the filing of the suit, and that the act or omission was discovered within two years.
The dentist claimed...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
