HENSEL v. HENSEL

No. 47977.

266 N.W.2d 712 (1978)

William A. HENSEL, Appellant, v. Janice Kay HENSEL, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

May 26, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Douglas, Jaycox, Trawick & McManus, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Gerald C. Magee, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.


TODD, Justice.

William A. Hensel appeals from the judgment and decree of dissolution of marriage entered in the Hennepin County District Court. We affirm.

The focal issue raised on appeal is whether the respondent Janice Hensel's vested interest in a profit-sharing plan is property acquired during coverture subject to the disposition provision of Minn.St. 518.58. Appellant contends that the trial court abused its discretion in failing to include that asset...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases