Judgment affirmed.
The trial court correctly charged the jury that the defense of agency, though applicable to the crime of criminal sale of a controlled substance, is not relevant to the crime of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the fifth degree (see Penal Law, § 220.09). This holding obtains because the crime of mere possession of a controlled substance is punishable without regard to whether the possessor is acting as seller or buyer, or the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.