STATE v. FRANKLIN

No. 77-209C; CA 10593.

584 P.2d 368 (1978)

36 Or.App. 413

STATE of Oregon, Respondent, v. Vernell FRANKLIN, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided October 2, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

J. Marvin Kuhn, Deputy Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the brief was Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem.

Thomas H. Denney, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were James A. Redden, Atty. Gen., Walter L. Barrie, Sol. Gen. and Kathleen Dodds, Certified Law Student, Salem.

Before SCHWAB, C.J., and THORNTON and TANZER, JJ.


TANZER, Judge.

Defendant appeals contending that his sentence is invalid because the trial court did not state its reasons for the sentence as required by ORS 137.120(2). We have hitherto held that such cases require remand for the imposition of new sentences with statements of reasons. State v. Smith, 34 Or.App. 539, 579 P.2d 261 rev. pending (1978).

The state defends the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases