1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.2d
  4. 89 Wn.2d
  5. 89 Wn.2d 862 (1978)
 

SAVE v. BOTHELL

No. 44505.

89 Wn.2d 862 (1978)

576 P.2d 401

SAVE A VALUABLE ENVIRONMENT, Respondent, v. THE CITY OF BOTHELL, ET AL, Defendants, DOMENICO VITULLI, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

March 30, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hillis, Phillips, Cairncross, Clark & Martin, P.S., by Jerome L. Hillis, Peter L. Buck, and Susan R. Agid, for appellants.

David Schnapf and Hubbard & Burns, Inc., P.S., for respondent.

HOROWITZ, J.

This appeal concerns the validity of a zoning ordinance of the City of Bothell, which rezones a parcel of farmland to permit construction of a major regional shopping center, and of the proceedings leading to its enactment. A judgment entered in King County Superior Court invalidated the ordinance on the grounds it constituted illegal spot zoning and the proceedings prior to its enactment violated the appearance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases