PUD v. BROADVIEW TELEVISION

No. 44660.

91 Wn.2d 3 (1978)

586 P.2d 851

SNOHOMISH COUNTY PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 1, Respondent, v. BROADVIEW TELEVISION COMPANY, ET AL, Appellants.

The Supreme Court of Washington, En Banc.

November 16, 1978.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Riddell, Williams, Ivie, Bullitt & Walkinshaw, Stimson Bullitt, and W. Michael Hafferty, for appellants.

Williams, Novak & Hansen, P.S., Edward D. Hansen, and James D. Twisselman, for respondent.


ROSELLINI, J.

In this action to recover unpaid charges for the use of the respondent's utility poles, summary judgment was granted against the appellants. The Superior Court found that there was no disputed issue of material fact and that the affirmative defenses were insufficient to relieve the appellants of liability.

The respondent is engaged in the distribution and sale of electrical energy in Snohomish County, pursuant to RCW Title 54. It licenses the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases