1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 86 Cal.App.3d
  5. 86 Cal.App.3d 5 (1978)
 

PACIFIC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING CO. v. CITY OF BURBANK

Docket No. 52614.

86 Cal.App.3d 5 (1978)

149 Cal. Rptr. 906

PACIFIC OUTDOOR ADVERTISING COMPANY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF BURBANK, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five.

November 1, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Thomas G. Baggot for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Samuel Gorlick, City Attorney, and Huston T. Carlyle, Jr., Assistant City Attorney, for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

STEPHENS, J.

This appeal is taken from a judgment in favor of the City of Burbank (hereinafter Burbank) on the issue of its liability in an alleged inverse condemnation action brought by plaintiff-appellant Pacific Outdoor Advertising Company (hereinafter Pacific). The principal issue was whether Burbank was liable for allegedly inversely condemning Pacific's six outdoor advertising...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases