1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 241 S.E.2d
  5. 241 S.E.2d 667 (1978)
 

STATE v. CHAPMAN

No. 69.

241 S.E.2d 667 (1978)

STATE of North Carolina v. Billy Joe CHAPMAN.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

March 7, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen., William A. Raney, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., and Jo Anne Sanford Routh, Associate Atty., Raleigh, for the State.

Childers & Fowler, Max L. Childers and Roberts, Caldwell & Planer, Joseph B. Roberts, Mount Holly, for defendant appellant.

SHARP, Chief Justice.

Defendant brings to this Court nine of his original 15 assignments of error, to wit, Nos. 2-5 and 10-14. After a careful consideration of the record and briefs we have concluded that it would be a labor in vain to discuss in detail all of these assignments, for none discloses prejudicial error. The majority, therefore, will receive summary treatment.

The background of assignment No. 2 is this:

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases