Defendants and appellants Flowers and Sons Development Corporation, Jannan Construction, Inc., Stan Flowers and Stan Flowers Company, Inc., appeal from the judgment dismissing their petition for writ of prohibition. They contend on appeal that (1) their petition for writ of prohibition was not prematurely filed; and (2) the municipal court lacked jurisdiction over respondent's amended complaint.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
FLOWERS & SONS DEVELOPMENT CORP v. MUNICIPAL COURT
Docket No. 42357.
86 Cal.App.3d 818 (1978)
150 Cal. Rptr. 555
FLOWERS AND SONS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, Defendant and Respondent; JOSEPH MUSTO ESTATE COMPANY, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
November 29, 1978.
November 29, 1978.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Kerner, Colangelo & Imlay, Morrill Dunn III and James D. Hobbs for Plaintiffs and Appellants.
No appearance for Defendant and Respondent.
Tobin & Tobin, John L. Hosack and Rand L. Peebles for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.
Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
