1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.E.2d
  4. 244 S.E.2d
  5. 244 S.E.2d 654 (1978)
 

STATE v. HOUSE

No. 12.

244 S.E.2d 654 (1978)

295 N.C. 189

STATE of North Carolina v. Richard E. HOUSE.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

June 6, 1978.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Rufus L. Edmisten, Atty. Gen. by Jane Rankin Thompson, Associate Atty. Gen., Raleigh, for the State.

T. S. Royster, and John H. Pike, Oxford, for defendant.

LAKE, Justice.

The defendant's contention that his motion to dismiss the bill of indictment should have been granted for the reason that it contains no attestation by the foreman of the grand jury that twelve or more grand jurors concurred in the finding of a true bill is without merit.

G.S. 15A-644 provides:

"Form and content of indictment, information or presentment. — (a) An indictment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases